On Monday, ENews Park Forest reported that sixteen largely polluting states filed a lawsuit to prevent new smog rules from being enacted. Much of their desire to do so was to save big utilities and coal companies that gave an estimated $5 million in contributions to governors and attorneys general who supported them. Personally, I find it appalling that these states would put money ahead of environmental protection and public health. How do you feel about this?08 February 2012
States Oppose New Pollution Reduction Rules
On Monday, ENews Park Forest reported that sixteen largely polluting states filed a lawsuit to prevent new smog rules from being enacted. Much of their desire to do so was to save big utilities and coal companies that gave an estimated $5 million in contributions to governors and attorneys general who supported them. Personally, I find it appalling that these states would put money ahead of environmental protection and public health. How do you feel about this?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I feel that is pretty awful, too!! However, hopefully the media exposure of this will change the outcome of the situation. It is also interesting to note that 7 of those states are in the southeast, and there aren't any states on the west coast or in the New England area on the list.
ReplyDeleteI also know that Georgia doesn't require annual smog tests on cars like in California.